National Center on Domestic and Sexual Violence. THE 2. 00. 2 USER- FRIENDLY HANDBOOK FOR PROJECT EVALUATION, Joy Frechtling Westat, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA: January 2. Curtis and Surabhi Kukk. Below is a list of ALL Blueprints Model and Promising programs. You may limit the number of programs shown by selecting two or more. To find specific programs matching the needs of your community or targeted population, please. Sherrill, MSN, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF. Karin is a nurse educator with a passion for faculty development and student success. She teaches at Maricopa Community Colleges and Upper Iowa University, specializing in the. Program description of Quantum Opportunity Program (QOP). The Programs that Work section of the Promising Practices Network (PPN) site features descriptions of evaluated programs that improve outcomes for children. Health IT Curriculum Resources for Educators. Meaningful Use Case Studies. Florida Physician uses EHR for Practice Improvement Effort; A Solo Practitioner Uses EHR to Assess Quality of Care. Table 2 Comparison between proposed and actual evaluation methodologies among crime prevention projects (%) NCCPP POCA funding program; Projects not yet evaluated a (n=186) Projects that had been evaluated b (n=37). Current developments, information highlights and resources on federal and state level health care reforms. From the National Conference of State Legislatures. See e-learning tool, Measuring the Impact of Your Sexual and Domestic Violence Prevention Efforts. Team Mission: Provide leadership to improve outcomes and ensure a free appropriate public education for students protected under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Especially for Families. Paul, MN: 2. 01. 5. Read Blog posting. A CAMPUS- COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR PREVENTION: EVALUATING PREVENTION PROGRAMMING IN NORTH CAROLINA(podcast of an interview conducted by Deena Fulton, Prevent. Connect), Laurie Graham, Rachel Valentine and Alexis Kralic, Orange County Rape Crisis Center, Chapel Hill, NC: July 2. A critical review of interventions for the primary prevention of perpetration of partner violence (abstract), Daniel J. Whitaker, et al, Aggression and Violent Behavior (volume 1. EVALUATING COLLABORATIVES ~ REACHING THE POTENTIAL, Ellen Taylor- Powell, Boyd Rossing and Jean Geran, University of Wisconsin Extension, Cooperative Extension, Madison, WI: July 1. Evaluating COMMUNITY COALITION CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONING: A SUMMARY OF MEASUREMENT TOOLS, M. Sharpe, Health Education Research (volume 1. Evaluating Coordinated Community Responses to Domestic Violence, Melanie Shepard, National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women, Harrisburg, PA: April 1. EVALUATING SOCIAL INNOVATION, Hallie Preskill and Tanya Beer, FSG and Center for Evaluation Innovation, Washington, DC: 2. Evaluation FOR IMPROVEMENT: A SEVEN- STEP EMPOWERMENT EVALUATION APPROACH FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION ORGANIZATIONS, Pamela J. Cox, Dana Keener, Tiffanee L. Woodard and Abraham H. Wandersman, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: 2. EVALUATION HANDBOOK, W. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI: updated January 2. EVALUATION MATTERS ~ LESSONS FROM YOUTH- SERVING ORGANIZATIONS, Mary K. Winkler, Brett Theodos and Michel Grosz, The Urban Institute and The World Bank, Washington, DC. Gibbons, National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women, Harrisburg, PA: January 2. AN EVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR SELF- CARE PROGRAMS IN AGENCIES SERVING ADULT AND CHILD VICTIMS OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE IN TEXAS, No. Evaluation Toolkit, Friends ~ National Resource Center for Community- Based Child Abuse Prevention, Chapel Hill, NC. Evaluation Toolkit, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI. Evaluation: Designs and Approaches, National Center Brief,Promote. Prevent, Newton, MA: 2. EVALUATION: WHAT'S IN IT FOR YOU? An Evidence- Based Review of Sexual Assault Preventive Intervention Programs, Shannon Morrison, Jennifer Hardison, Anita Mathew and Joyce O’Neil, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC: September 2. EXAMPLES OF DATA COLLECTION METHODS, Wendi Siebold, updated November 7, 2. FRAMEWORK FOR PROGRAM EVALUATION IN PUBLIC HEALTH, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (volume 4. RR- 1. 1), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: September 1. GOOD STORIES AREN'T ENOUGH: BECOMING OUTCOMES- DRIVEN IN WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Martha A. Miles, Public / Private Ventures, July 2. GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A NEEDS ASSESSMENT, Office for Victims of Crime, Washington, DC: January 2. GUIDE TO HIRING A LOCAL EVALUATOR,Office for Victims of Crime, Washington, DC: January 2. GUIDE TO PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION,Office for Victims of Crime, Washington, DC: January 2. HANDBOOK ON IMPACT EVALUATION ~ QUANTITATIVE METHODS AND PRACTICES, Shahidur R. Koolwal and Hussain A. Samad, The World Bank, Washington, DC: 2. THE JOURNEY CONTINUES: ENSURING A CROSS- CULTURALLY COMPETENT EVALUATION, The Colorado Trust, Denver, CO: 2. Copyright . Logic MODEL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, W. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI: updated January 2. MAPPing CHANGE ~ USING A THEORY OF CHANGE TO GUIDE PLANNING AND EVALUATION, Grant. Craft, New York, NY. Ma. THEMATICA Evaluati. On DEMONSTRATES EFFECTIVENESS OF STATE- BASED ADVOCACY Program, Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC: September 1. Measuring Program OUTCOMES: A PRACTICAL APPROACH (excerpts), United Way of America, Alexandria, VA. Measuring Success: A GUIDE TO BECOMING AN Ev. IDENCE- BASED PRACTICE, Jennifer Fratello, Tarika Daftary Kapur and Alice Chasan, Vera Institute on Justice, New York, NY: April 2. MEASURING SUCCESS: EVALUATING BATTERERS INTERVENTION PROGRAMS, Kathleen Carlin, Men Stopping Violence, Decatur, GA. MISSOURI DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROGRAM MONTHLY REPORTING, Missouri Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence, Jefferson, City, MO: 2. Narrative Guide. Monthly Services Report. Member Program 2. Services. MONITORING AND Evaluatin. G GENDER- BASED VIOLENCE: A TECHNICAL SEMINAR RECOGNIZING THE 2. DAYS OF ACTIVISM', Interagency Gender Working Group, Washington, DC: November 2. MOVING TOWARD EVIDENCE- BASED PRACTICES: A GUIDE FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORGANIZATIONS, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, Reno, NV: April 2. Copyright . Paul, MN: March 2. NEXT MILLENIUM CONFERENCE: ENDING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; EVALUATION 1. II, #2. 47), Eleanor Lyon, Anuradha Sharma, Angela M. Parmely and Stephanie Riger, September 2. OHIO PRIMARY PREVENTION OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE & SEXUAL VIOLENCE EMPOWERMENT TOOLKIT, Amy Bush Stevens and Sandra Ortega, Ohio Domestic Violence Network and Ohio Department of Health Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Prevention Program, Columbus, OH: December 2. ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPOrt FOR EVALUATION: CREATING CULTure. S OF CURIOSi. TY IN THE ANTI- SEXUAL VIOLENCE MOVEMENT, National Sexual Violence Resource Center, Enola, PA: April 2. OUTCOME EVALUATION STRATEGIES FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICE PROGRAMS: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, Cris M. Sullivan and Suzanne Coats, Michigan Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence, Okemos, MI: 2. OUTCOME MEASURES FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES IN TEXAS, Texas Association Against Sexual Assault, Austin, TX: 2. THE PITFALLS OF MONITORING AND Evaluati. On: DO CURRENT FRAMEWORKS REALLY SERVE US?, Kathambi Kinoti and Sanushka Mudaliar, Association for Women's Rights in Development, Toronto, CA; Mexico City, MX; and Cape Town, ZA: April 1. Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Inspector General, Washington, DC: November 1. PRACTICAL Evaluati. On OF PUBLIC HEALTH Programs WORKBOOK, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: 2. A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN DEVELOPING EVALUATION QUESTIONS, Hallie Preskill and Nathalie Jones, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ: 2. Hagen, National Resource Center on Domestic Violence, Harrisburg, PA: 2. PROMISING PRACTICES IN MONITORING AND Evaluati. On OF GENDER- BASED VIOLENCE, Interagency Gender Working Group, Washington, DC: November 7, 2. REFRAMING EVALUATION AS A TOOL FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE & COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT, Catalyst Connections (volume 2, issue 2), Transforming Communities, San Rafael, CA: April 2. A r. EVIEW AND SYNTHESIS OF CURRENT RESEARCH ON CROSS- CULTURAL EVALUATION, Jill Anne Chouinard and J. Bradley Cousins, American Journal of Evaluation (volume 3. Bradley Cousins. a room of our own: Sexual assault survivors evaluate services ~ A RESEARCH REPORt From THE NEw YORK CITY ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT, Deborah Fry, New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault, New York, NY: April 2. SERVICES FOR IPV VICTIMS: ENCOURAGING STRONGER RESEARCH METHODS TO PRODUCE MORE VALID RESULTS, Melissa Rorie, Bethany Backes and Jaspreet Chahal, NIJ Journal (issue 2. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC: October 2. SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: LESSONS FROM BLUEPRINTS, Sharon Mihalic, Katherine Irwin, Abigail Fagan, Diane Ballard, and Delbert Elliott, OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, DC: July 2. Raphael and Beverly A. Sizemore, Horizon Research, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC: 1. Te. CHNICAL ASSISTANCE GUIDE AND RESOURCE KIT FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION AND EVALUATION, Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape, Enola, PA. Paper 1 ~ Evaluation capacity building in the Respect, Responsibility and Equality program: Report on Stage 1 (2. Michael Flood. Paper 2 ~ Evaluating preventing violence against women initiatives: A participatory and learning- oriented approach for primary prevention in Victoria, Wei Leng Kwok. TURNING POINT ~ COLLABORATING FOR A NEW CENTURY IN PUBLIC HEALTH ~ GUIDEBOOK FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, Patricia Lichiello, Turning Point National Program Office at The University of Washington, Seattle, WA: December 1. UNDERSTANDING EVIDENCE PART 1: BEST AVAILABLE RESEARCH EVIDENCE. A GUIDE TO THE CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS., Richard W. Puddy and Natalie Wilkins, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: 2. USING DATA FOR SUCCESS: FIVE ACTIVITIES FOR WORKFORCE MANAGERS TO USE WITH FRONTLINE STAFF, Public / Private Ventures, January 2. USING EXCEL FOR ANALYZING SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES, Jennifer Leahy, University of Wisconsin- Extension Cooperative Extension, Madison, WI. USING OUTCOME INFORMATION ~ making data pay off, Elaine Morley and Linda M. Lampkin, Urban Institute, Washington, DC. Bloom, USAID East Africa, Interagency Gender Working Group and MEASURE Evaluation, Washington, DC: October 2. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN Evaluati. On AND RESEARCH ~ AND WHY DO WE CARE? WISEWOMAN PROGRAM Evaluati. On PLAN TEMPLATE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Atlanta, GA: revised August 2. WOMEN IN CRISIS EMERGENCY SHELTER LOGIC MODEL, YWCA- South Hampton Roads, Norfolk, VA: revised July 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2016
Categories |